Make It So

Parashat VaYakhel 5779

by Meir Sendor

The town of Tzfat together with the Jewish National Fund recently rehabbed a park that had languished in disrepair, closed to the public for several years. Each organization had argued that the other was responsible to do the work and so nothing got done. In the midst of the wrangling a developer put in a bid to turn the park into a large, densely settled apartment complex, and a citizens’ group rallied opposition to the plan. Finally our new mayor stepped up, got an infusion of money from the government and got everyone to work together to renovate the park, and it’s beautiful.

It’s called Emek HaTekhelet — Tekhelet Ravine. Tekhelet is the color of the special strand of blue that is wrapped around the white strands of Tzitzit, and it was a royal color used prominently in the textiles of the Mishkan. It’s also the sky-blue with which many of the walls and homes of Tzfat are painted, so it’s the official town color. The park is at the northern entrance to town, surrounding a steep ravine with a mountain stream that runs from top to bottom, gathering in ponds and pools and waterfalls, with ducks and geese and a variety of deer. We visited the park the other day with good friends from Jerusalem and Sharon, Massachusetts, wandering along the switchback paths, appreciating the flora and fauna and the work that went into the reconstruction.

How to transition effectively from idea to action and get people to work together is also a central theme of this week’s parashah. We’re in the midst of the portions dealing with the Mishkan, from the planning stage of the previous weeks, to the construction stage this week, to the assembly next week and the formal dedication in the weeks to come. Rabbi Hayyim Yosef David Aluzai points to a key verse:

שמות פרק לה כא

ויבאו כל איש אשר נשאו לבו וכל אשר נדבה רוחו אתו הביאו את תרומת יקוק למלאכת אהל מועד ולכל עבדתו ולבגדי הקדש:


And every person whose heart inspired them and everyone whose spirit prompted them came and brought the donation for HaShem for the work of the tent of meeting and for all its labor and for the holy garments.

Rabbi Azulai comments:

There’s a big distance between thought and action, between good will and its materialization. Many good intentions evaporate before they come to actualization. Many people carry within them exalted ideas and desires of the heart that never arrive at action. Therefore the Torah tells us that regarding the donations to the Mishkan there was not one person like that. “Every person whose heart inspired them and… whose spirit prompted them,” who had a will to donate, did not just leave it as will, rather, they all “brought the donation for HaShem,” they fulfilled their will and brought forth their thought from potential to actual.

Rabbi Azulai draws attention to the difficulty of transforming thought to action. The material and social worlds have their own capacities and limitations, their own pacing, that can both comply with and resist the guidance of ideas. So we need to understand and navigate the structures and rhythms of the world, and apply our will persistently to be able to bring ideas to fruition. The construction of the Mishkan is an example of a successful process of transforming thought to deed.

In an essay that appears in Orot, Rav Avraham Yitzhak HaKohen Kook points out another challenge of actualizing ideas:

When lofty ideals, that exist in an indeterminate state, in the root of the soul and its aspirations, become confined within a particular boundary and enclosure, they immediately darken and descend from their hidden power. They gain a practical advantage and a handhold for action through their limitation, but they lose the higher purity they had before their materialization within their specific limits… Then [the ideals] remain with this mission: after they have become actualized and have become things that can be grasped by the  practical world, they must be brought back to that level of height and purity and to that quantitative and qualitative expansiveness  which they had while they were in the realm of the ideal forms.

Rav Kook’s point is that in the process of bringing an ideal from the mind into the material world, there’s a compromise: the ideal becomes real, but it also becomes limited and less radiantly pure and inspirational. So the first attempt at actualization is not the end of the process. We need to keep assessing the shortcomings of what we have brought into actuality in comparison with our ideals, and keep making adjustments back and forth to help the real match the ideal more and more closely, and help the ideal shape the real more and more effectively.

At the end of his essay, published 1920 though written before the First World War, Rav Kook moves from the general to the specific case that he is really talking about: the re-establishment of a State of Israel in the Land of Israel. He is writing in the midst of the second wave of Aliyah of the modern period, he senses its great promise and sees clearly its current limitations. He envisions the hard process ahead with prescience:

Inestimably beautiful is the ideal of establishing a treasured people, a kingdom of priests and a holy nation, out of a people sunk in frightening servitude, the brilliance of whose ancestral origin illuminates its darkness. In the divine heights this ideal abides in the secret hiding place in its purity. But it must be materialized, wrapped within a particular boundary, among people with good and also evil inclinations, in communities in need of food and sustenance, of gaining a foothold in the land, with governmental authority. Communal life needs to include everyone, from the pinnacle of pure spirits and elevated refined souls to the lowest, limited souls engaged in the lower aspects of life


(“The Soul of Nationhood and its Body,” Orot,132-35).

The re-establishment of the nation of Israel in our Land is a complicated process. Our ideals, expressed in our Torah and our rabbinic tradition, are exalted, but our realities are difficult. We are a passionate people with, yes, all kinds of inclinations, from the most spiritually and ethically refined to the more coarse, bless us all. Our homeland happens to be in the most contentious neighborhood on the planet, and our connection to our homeland is being challenged by stubborn and violent enemies and their hypocritical supporters. We have had to reinvent government for ourselves, and governing is a messy business. Our nation has, and needs, the full range of human character. Everyone contributes in their way. What we have accomplished in a relatively short time is impressive, but we are very much a work in progress.

Our city park is not so grand a communal project as the Mishkan — though it’s named after the Mishkan’s sky-blue hue. But when a newly-elected mayor is able to get wrangling organizations and stakeholders to put aside differences and work together to rebuild something beautiful – hey, we can celebrate with a modest and enjoyable victory lap around the park.

Multiple kinds of deer traveling together

The duck ponds

Blossoming almond trees

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.